Posts

Vol.4 No.4 – 17 : Evaluation of circulating antigen in urine technique for diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium infection

By : Ahmed Abdelhalim Yameny

Society of Pathological Biochemistry and Hematology, Egypt

Ahmed A. Yameny (Email: dr.ahmedyameny@yahoo.com)

DOI: 10.21608/jbaar.2018.155494

Abstract

Background : Diagnosis of urinary and intestinal schistosomiasis by detecting circulating Schistosome antigens in serum and urine have been developed and assessed to dissolve problems with parasitological diagnosis in low endemic areas or for early diagnosis, this study aimed to evaluate commercially available kit, using circulating antigen in urine as alternative for microscopic testing of urine to diagnose S.haematobium infection Subjects and methods: This study is a cross-sectional study designed to evaluate circulating antigen a commercially available kit was used for determine urinary schistosomiasis  in the study population, this performed on 50 positive S.haematobium samples and 50 negative samples for individuals matching in age and sex , in addition, urine microscopic examination was done for detection of S.haematobium eggs by sedimentation centrifugation and nuclepore filteration techniques. Results :  The results showed that circulating antigen kit in urine had a sensitivity of 56% and specificity of 76%.. PPVs was 70% whereas NPVs was 63.3 %. As for diagnostic efficiency, it was 66%, where the area under the curve (AUC) was sufficient 0.63 . Conclusion and Recommendations: Years ago this commercial kit used in our study and in all medical laboratories in Egypt for detection of schistosome antigen in urine is called schistofast bilharzial antigen in urine , this study showed low sensitivity (56%) and lowe specificity (76) than expected resuls for detection of circulating antigen and they are generally more expensive than microscopic examination.


Evaluation of circulating antigen in urine technique for diagnosis of schistosoma haematobium infection-converted

Download PDF

Vol.3 No.4 – 9 : The Validity of Haematuria and Proteinuria by chemical reagent strip for diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium infection

By : Ahmed Abdelhalim Yameny

Society of Pathological Biochemistry and Hematology, Egypt

Ahmed A. Yameny (Email: dr.ahmedyameny@yahoo.com)

Abstract

Background : Urinary schistosomiasis is a chronic water-borne disease that affect the life of millions of people globally especially the rural areas of developing countries, Microscopic examination can quantify the intensity of the S.haematobium infection, however it is relatively insensitive especially in situations involving low level infections. Hematuria and proteinuria have been considered as alternatives for microscopic testing of urine to diagnose S.haematobium infection, and as a single tool in large-scale control programs. Subjects and methods : This study is a cross-sectional study designed to evaluate haematuria and proteinuria by chemical reagent strip for determine urinary schistosomiasis in the study population, to overall sample was 1000 patients of different ages in addition, urine microscopic examination was done for detection of S.haematobium eggs by sedimentation centrifugation and nuclepore filteration techniques. Results : The results showed that haematuria by chemical reagent strips had a sensitivity of 27.8% and specificity of 63.4%. When proteinuria was considered, sensitivity increased to 67.1% also specificity increased to 80.7%. When both haematuria and proteinuria was considered, sensitivity was 45.2% and specificity 85.9%. sensitivity in between the previous results. PPVs ranged between 6.13% and 22.9% whereas NPVs ranged between 91.1% and 96.6%. As for diagnostic efficiency, it was best for both haematuria and proteinuria (83.1%) followed by proteinuria 79.6% and least for haematuria (60.7%), where the area under the curve (AUC) was sufficient for both haematuria and proteinuria 0.61 and good for proteinuria( 0.71),where it was not useful for haematuria (0.48). Conclusion and Recommendations : Most previous studies showed blood in urine or microhaematuria is more important than protein and used chemical reagent strips to detect microhaematuria and not protein. While this study showed detect of protein by chemical reagent strip is more important than microhaematuria by chemical reagent strip, and statistical parameters tested were higher with proteinuria than haematuria .The sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, likelihood ratio for positive results, diagnostic efficiency and area under the curve all were higher in proteinuria than haematuria. The sum of proteinuria and haematuria had more specificity . In this study we demonstrate that the use of urine reagent strips for both proteinuria and haematuria might be considered for the diagnosis of S. haematobium where microscopy is unavailable.


The Validity of Haematuria and Proteinuria by chemical reagent strip for diagnosis of Schistosoma haematobium infection

Download PDF

Vol.3 No.4 – 8: The validity of the Questionnaire to identify Schistosoma haematobium infection

By : Ahmed Abdelhalim Yameny

Society of Pathological Biochemistry and Hematology, Egypt

Ahmed A. Yameny (Email: dr.ahmedyameny@yahoo.com)

Abstract

Background: Schistosomiasis is considered the most important water-based disease, Estimation of S.haematobium infection has been recognized in Egypt since ancient times, hematuria known as AAA disease. One of the symptoms of urinary schistosomiasis is visible blood in urine, since this is normally well recognized by children, the assessment of urinary schistosomiasis can be undertaken rapidly and accurately by using a simple questionnaire. This study was done to test the validity of self-reported blood in urine by questionnaire compared to parasitological methods. Subjects and methods: Across -sectional study was carried. To overall total sample was 1000 patients of different ages, data about the history of recent symptoms of schistosomiasis as haematuria and dysuria were collected. Also, urine microscopic examination was done for the detection of S.haematobium eggs by sedimentation centrifugation and nuclepore filtration techniques. Results: The results showed that haematuria by questionnaire had a sensitivity of 54.4% and specificity of 90.8%. When dysuria was considered, sensitivity increased to 75.95% but specificity decreased to 51.2%. When both self-reported haematuria and dysuria were considered, sensitivity was 68.3% and specificity 85%, in between the previous results. PPVs ranged between 11.8% and 33.6% whereas NPVs ranged between 95.9% and 96.1%. As for diagnostic efficiency, it was best for haematuria (87.9%).

Conclusion: questionnaire has a moderate sensitivity, a simple questionnaire asking “Did you have blood in urine during the last month?” and “Did you suffer from schistosomiasis during the last months?” is a validated tool that allows for a decision to be taken, a questionnaire was shown to have a very high negative predictive value 96%, so that it is safe to use it to identify communities with a low prevalence so that they can be excluded from the first phases of a control program, but microscopic examination is better and not expensive for diagnosis of urinary schistosomiasis infection.


The-validity-of-the-Questionnaire-to-identify-Schistosoma-haematobium-infection-converted.pdf

Download PDF